There's a Law For That

    “A lot of what this — young man did was clearly against the law. But the fact that it was against the law did not prevent it from happening.”
    Wrong again Mitt, from the knife to the assault rifle and the bullet proof vest to the high capacity magazine, every purchase was well within our laws.
    “Well, I don’t know that I’m gonna be able to find a way to prevent people who want to provide harm, from being able to purchase things that could carry out that harm.”
    I don't know Mitt, how about a law that states,
    #1 Photo ID must be presented to make such purchases.
    #2 Retailers must keep the personal information of the buyer and the purchases for two years.
    #3 Limit the amount the buyer may purchase in a one month period.
    That would be a good place to start. What's that? I've just been notified that there's already a law in place with those stipulations.
     So I guess Mitt was right, those purchases must have been illegal. The only problem is the man was buying weapons to kill, he wasn't buying Sudafed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Straw?

All in a Days Work (part II)

And Your Winner Is